Good times for Oil States, ‘dangerous phase’ for global economy says IMF
Posted on 26 October 2011 with 1 comment from readers
While this is a ‘dangerous phase’ for the global economy the outlook for the Oil States, except those participating in the Arab Spring uprisings is positive in the short to medium term, according to the quarterly regional economic outlook published by the IMF today.
The GDP of Libya will fall by around 50 per cent this year. By contrast Saudi Arabian GDP will grow by 5.4 per cent and Qatar by nine per cent. Next year the prediction is for five per cent GDP growth in the kingdom and 8.4 per cent in Qatar. The UAE will manage 3.3 per cent growth this year and 3.9 per cent next.
Regional director Masood Ahmed said the Oil States unaffected by uprisings are benefiting from a combination of high oil prices, high oil production and a substantial boost in government spending. He noted that Saudi Arabia’s high oil output to replace lost Libyan production represented a net gain to the country.
Public spending surge
However, Mr Ahmed said that government expenditure has risen by a ’surprising amount’ and the breakeven oil price for these economies has increased to $80, leaving them vulnerable to falling oil prices. The rise in Saudi Arabian public spending is 25 per cent of GDP.
Deutsche Bank has oil prices averaging $85-95 a barrel this year and falling to $85 in 2012, so this breakeven point is getting close. Below that and the Oil States would be running deficits to finance their massive hikes in spending, mainly though not exclusively on increases salaries for nationals and social payments.
But this does leave the Oil States without unrest enjoying good times at a moment when the new IMF chief executive Christine Lagarde has warned of a ‘dangerous phase’ for the global economy. The high oil prices benefiting the Oil States are one of a long list of negative headwinds for the global economy next year.
Global headwinds
These include a credit contraction as European banks absorb bad debts like Greek sovereign debt, stagnation in the US economy and a slowdown in the Asian tiger economies. The IMF has downgraded its forecasts across the world from the relatively optimistic forecasts in the spring.
The countries impacted by the Arab Spring are expected to take longer to recover than often thought, particularly those like Libya, Yemen and Syria with natural resources. ‘Transitional economies with natural resources can take four to five years to recover if other recent examples are a guide,’ commented DIFC chief economist Dr Nasser Saidi.
‘There is the J-curve effect as things get worse before they get better,’ added regional economic guru Dr Henry Azzam. ‘The private sector in these countries is discredited by links to the former regime and corruption, and Islamists will tend to win the elections. We are going to have to learn to live with Islamic democracy. They manage it in Indonesia and Malaysia.’

1 Comment posted by readers:
People had to spend 1/3 of their lives in school to figure out that OIL exporters will do fine? I get frustrated when people complain about $90 crude oil. Like what the hell else are you going to use to run the world? A gallon of gasoline has the equivalent of over a week of human labor in it. You can’t find labor that cheap in Bangladesh. The amount of money that will pour into the Middle East oil exporters in the next 20 years will be in the tens of trillions of dollars. All you have to do is look at the big country under embargo over there. Someone is always in line to buy their oil. You don’t need an IMF building full of PhDs to figure out why.
It is like saying Exxon will do fine. Ya think? (They just found oil off Vietnam. Weren’t we carpet bombing them with B-52s a while back? If I didn’t know better, I might think that we need more enlightened leaders over here.)
Pritchard is pushing the USA in the Telegraph. If it weren’t for Canada, I would say he is wrong. And not much oil remains in ‘depleted’ USA oil fields if you are limited to conventional vertical wells. Drilling sideways can change the game with both oil and gas. Coal bed methane too. The Brits are studying that in the North. The North Sea still doesn’t appear to be played out. They lucked out there. If Russia wasn’t run by mobsters, you younger folks might get rich investing in drilling on their gigantic, shallow Arctic continental shelf. Check out the size of that sucker on Google Earth. And the ice is melting fast.
Every time I get frustrated with the USA politicians and Wall Street crooks, I can console myself with the thought that I don’t live in the PIIGS. They are going to be in for a very rough decade. It will be interesting to see if they stay content taking orders from Berlin. What is it with those Germans, anyway? You would think that long word language would slow them down. Maybe global warming will enable them to spend more leisure time outside soaking up the sun, instead of inside bent over the science books and computer screens.