ArabianMoney

Print this page
Banking & Finance Sign Up for free News Alerts

Why I am staying out of equities for 2010 unless they crash

Posted on 05 December 2009 with no comments from readers

It was back in late 1999 that I first contacted Dr. Marc Faber in Hong Kong and sought his advice on investments. I had come across him on a website and bought a book about his past predictions. He was not as well known then outside Asia.

But what I had noticed was that he agreed with me that stock markets looked way overvalued as the Millennium approached and were heading for a crash. We met in his dingy office in Central in Hong Kong and I have been a fan ever since.

Yet a decade later and in my book not much has changed. I was perfectly right not to buy equities in 1999. They have moved sideways only, with some enormous fluctuations, and still look significantly overvalued. Today the S&P is in the mid-80s on price-to-earnings and actually much higher than in 1999.

Miracles do not happen

In March this year global stock markets crashed to a low point. Since then we have seen an almost miraculous recovery in financial markets, and a stabilization of global trade and industrial output at lower levels after a bigger and faster fall than in 1929.

But I don’t believe in miracles. What caused this recovery in financial markets is the aggressive printing of money, particularly in the US and UK via so-called quantitative easing. Equities have risen on this tidal wave of liquidity and currencies have devalued.

The result is a monstrous bubble in financial markets, bigger than in 1999 before the dot-com collapse. Dr. Faber has also noticed this phenomenon but appears convinced that money printing will continue to pump up the bubble on each correction, until a final collapse on some distant day.

I remain overly cautious perhaps, although I have made several great investments in the past decade unlike those who invested in the stock market in 1999. I think when you can identify an obvious bubble then it is best to be humble and stand aside, and not hope that you will be closest to the exit door when it blows up.

Having faith in the Fed

My faith in the ability of the Fed and US government to permanently deny gravity is also limited. I am a non-believer. Dr. Faber also heaps scorn on Mr. Bernanke and yet appears blinded by his charisma into thinking he can always make black turn into white.

What if the rally since March turns out to be part of the phase four down cycle described by Dr. Faber in his own investment classic ‘Tomorrow’s Gold’? Then it is a false recovery based on false optimism about a coming recovery, when in reality a further downturn is coming as the stimulus package and low interest rates become unsustainable.

Liquidity fueled rallies are notoriously fickle. Like J.P. Morgan’s taxi on a rainy Friday night in New York it tends not to be there when you need it most.

So if you put money into equities for 2010 then you are investing in a market completely miss-valued on fundamentals and prompt up by a liquidity bubble that is bound to ultimately pop.

The cunning plan of the banks is apparently to shift their bad debts into equity before the market crashes, thereby finally dumping their bad debts on to shareholders. If Marc Faber is right about the Fed’s ability to keep the bubble going, they might pull it off.

Cash and gold

Cash or gold sound a better investment, for in equities you risk losing a great deal of money and the upside will be limited. As in late 1999 I would sooner play safe and invest to make real money when asset prices are very much cheaper. That opportunity will occur again but only after the equity bubble has blown up.

Is it not odd that equity markets are leveraging up again just as business around the world is de-leveraging? That alone ought to keep you out of equities. For it means real business is still contracting. And do you want to buy shares in a contracting business? Why no of course not, and yet that is exactly what you are doing if you buy equities now, so why do it?

Stock markets around the world also still look highly valued by historical standards, even that bubble of 1999 has never fully deflated. In the past stock markets have faced long periods of much lower price-to-earnings ratios, and that is not where you will want to be invested for future capital gains.

(For the latest update on the US dollar rally and how it is turning stock and commodity markets click here)

Posted on 05 December 2009 Categories: Banking & Finance, Bond Markets, Gold & Silver, Hedge Funds, Investment Gurus, Private Equity, US Dollar, US Stocks

no Comments posted by readers:

Comment by Nikolay Mihaylov - 05 December 2009

Do you stay out of gold and minning stocks? Oil?

Ed Note: Yes, wait for a bottom. But do buy after a big correction or crash – these would be the best buys in those circumstances.

Comment by Peter Cooper - 06 December 2009

This is a great contrarian signal. The last time I took advice from Credit Suisse it was that gold prices were too high at $400…

Credit Suisse predicts good 2010 for global equities

Global equity markets could be posting a 12pc return by mid 2010, driven by better-than-expected growth and a near 30pc increase in earnings, Credit Suisse analysts expect.

By Angela Monaghan
Published: 6:32PM GMT 04 Dec 2009

The company upgraded Asia, excluding Japan, to 20pc from 15pc” and predicted an asset bubble in the region.

Credit Suisse also upgraded continental Europe to 10pc from 5pc, adding that the region’s economy was gaining momentum relative to others.

However, it downgraded the UK to 5pc, warning that the British Government was more likely than the rest of the G7 nations to suffer a debt funding crisis. Borrowing this year is expected to surpass £175bn.

It also said in a global equity strategy note that the global economy could grow by as much as 4.1pc in 2010, while monetary policy should remain loose and inflation subdued.
“We believe that the first half of 2010 will continue to be positive for equities,” it said.

Comment by tom - 06 December 2009

Excellent article, very refreshing, Tom

Comment by Peter Spring - 08 December 2009

Do you stay away from government bonds?

Ed Note: short term no, longer term yes

Comment by sham sunder - 13 December 2009

Good analysis,partcular high lighting the fact that equity leveraging and business de-leverging,that is negative divergence in prices of equities.

thanks and regards for author

Comment by jason - 14 December 2009

There was an old joke back in the tech days showing how non of the .com stocks lost money. The answer? We’ll make it back on volume.

This “recovery” is a mile wide and an inch deep. I expect an overall crash, more parity for dow/gold ratio then an explosion in PM’s as all fiat currency becomes questioned. Lot’s of people are going to be hurt badly.

Comment by Ramkumar - 14 December 2009

Factual Article according to me.

Comment by Kurt Lining - 16 December 2009

Thanks for your excellent reports and hard work!

And have a Merry Christmas!

-Kurt

Add your comment on this article:

Post your comment >

News Alerts: